Lahore – The Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) in Lahore has issued a definitive verdict on the controversial issue of conducting polygraph and photographic tests on Imran Khan, the founder and former chairman of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party. The court, presided over by Judge Manzar Ali Gul, ruled that the police had been given ample opportunity to carry out the investigative procedures but failed to do so on two separate occasions.
As a result, the court declined to grant a third chance to conduct the tests, emphasizing that such a move would constitute a waste of judicial resources and time. The case pertains to multiple charges against Imran Khan, including his alleged involvement in the May 9 Jinnah House attack and other violent incidents.
Background: May 9 Events and Legal Fallout
The Jinnah House Incident
The origin of the case lies in the violent protests that erupted on May 9, 2023, following the arrest of Imran Khan by paramilitary forces in connection with a corruption case. These protests turned violent in several parts of the country, especially in Lahore, where protesters stormed and set fire to Jinnah House, a historic military installation and residence of the Lahore Corps Commander.
The unprecedented attack on a military property shocked the nation and led to widespread condemnation. The state immediately launched a crackdown on those believed to be responsible, including top PTI leadership.
Cases Registered Against Imran Khan
As per official reports, at least 12 terrorism-related cases have been registered against Imran Khan, with charges ranging from:
- Inciting violence
- Vandalism
- Obstruction of law enforcement
- Terrorism under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA)
- Destruction of public and military property
The most high-profile among them is the Jinnah House attack case, where authorities allege that Imran Khan either incited or failed to prevent his supporters from carrying out the violent act.
The Polygraph and Photographic Test Controversy
What Are Polygraph and Photographic Tests?
A polygraph test, also known as a lie detector test, is used to determine the truthfulness of a person’s statements by measuring physiological responses such as heart rate, respiration, and perspiration while answering a series of questions.
A photographic test in this context typically refers to facial recognition analysis and other visual evidence methods aimed at verifying a suspect’s presence or involvement at the scene of the crime.
These tests are used as investigative tools in many jurisdictions but are often controversial due to concerns over their scientific reliability and admissibility in court.
Court’s Previous Orders and Police Non-Compliance
Judge Manzar Ali Gul revealed in the verdict that the police had been given two clear opportunities to carry out these tests on the accused. Despite the court’s directives, the Punjab Police failed to conduct either the polygraph or the photographic tests within the given timeframes.
“The prosecution was granted sufficient time to complete these critical investigative procedures,” the judge said in his remarks. “However, no meaningful progress was made.”
The judge added that granting another extension would serve no practical purpose, particularly given the importance of timely justice in terrorism cases.
Court Verdict: No Third Chance for Polygraph Test
The Anti-Terrorism Court firmly dismissed any further request for a polygraph or photographic test, marking a turning point in the judicial proceedings related to Imran Khan.
“The court believes that allowing a third attempt after two refusals by the police would only delay proceedings and burden the judicial system unnecessarily,” the written order stated.
This decision effectively closes the chapter on any further attempts by law enforcement to use these tools in the current stage of investigation related to Imran Khan.
Legal and Political Implications
Impact on Ongoing Terrorism Cases
The court’s decision may impact the direction and credibility of evidence in the multiple terrorism cases registered against the former Prime Minister. Since the polygraph and photographic tests could have provided supporting evidence, their absence may weaken the prosecution’s position in court.
However, legal experts argue that the prosecution still has access to other forms of evidence, including:
- CCTV footage
- Testimonies from co-accused
- Mobile phone data
- Digital communication records
Political Ramifications for PTI and Imran Khan
This development is significant not just from a legal standpoint but also for its political repercussions. Imran Khan, who has been facing continuous legal hurdles since his removal from power in April 2022, remains incarcerated and barred from contesting elections. His legal team has repeatedly claimed that the charges against him are politically motivated, aimed at silencing dissent and dismantling PTI.
The court’s refusal to allow a third attempt for the tests might be seen by PTI supporters as a relief, but it also indicates the seriousness with which the judiciary views procedural delays and the importance of efficient police work in politically sensitive cases.
Public Reactions and Expert Opinions
Mixed Public Response
Public response to the court’s verdict has been divided along political lines. PTI supporters welcomed the decision, claiming it saved the former prime minister from “fabricated forensic attempts.” Critics, however, argue that the court’s refusal might set a precedent for undermining scientific investigative tools in future terrorism cases.
Legal Experts Weigh In
According to legal analyst Barrister Salman Akram Raja, the court’s verdict is a “procedural reprimand” to the law enforcement agencies.
“The court hasn’t declared polygraph tests inadmissible,” he said. “It has simply refused to tolerate continued inefficiency or intentional delay by the police.”
Imran Khan’s Legal Strategy Going Forward
Defense Team’s Narrative
Imran Khan’s legal team has long claimed that the charges are a result of a “political vendetta” and has repeatedly called for transparent and fair investigations. With the polygraph test issue now behind them, the defense is expected to focus on:
- Discrediting available evidence
- Challenging eyewitness testimonies
- Demanding live court proceedings for transparency
Pending Cases and Future Hearings
Apart from the May 9 incidents, Imran Khan also faces cases related to:
- The Toshakhana gifts controversy
- The cipher case involving foreign policy leaks
- Alleged violations of Section 144 during protests
Each case has its own legal complexities and is likely to unfold over the coming months, ensuring that Imran Khan will remain at the center of Pakistan’s judicial and political landscape.
Conclusion: A Case That Reflects Pakistan’s Complex Political Landscape
The Anti-Terrorism Court’s ruling in the Imran Khan polygraph test case is emblematic of the high-stakes legal and political tensions in Pakistan today. By refusing a third opportunity to the police, the court has emphasized the importance of judicial efficiency and accountability in investigations, particularly in terrorism-related cases.
As Imran Khan continues to fight multiple legal battles, the focus now shifts to the upcoming hearings and how both the prosecution and defense will navigate the legal terrain without the aid of polygraph or photographic evidence.
