The decision will be pronounced today on the appeals of founder PTI and Bushra Bibi in the Iddat Nikah case.
The District and Sessions Court of Islamabad reserved its verdict on the Iddat Nikah case on May 23 after the arguments were completed by District and Sessions Judge Shahrukh Arjamand.
It should be remembered that in the Iddat Nikah case, lawyer Usman Gill has pleaded for annulment of the sentence. The hearing in the Iddat Nikah case has started, the verdict will be pronounced today.
It should be noted that the District and Sessions Court of Islamabad had reserved its decision on the appeals of Imran Khan and his wife Bushra Bibi against the sentence of the Iddat Nikah case, which will be heard today.
District and Sessions Judge Shahrukh Arjamand heard the appeals of former Prime Minister and founder of PTI and his wife Bushra Bibi against the sentence in the Eid-e-Adha Nikah case.
PTI lawyer Usman Riaz Gul and Raja Rizwan Abbasi advocate appeared before the court. Judge Shah Rukh Arjamand while talking to Shoaib Shaheen said that he has become quite weak, to which Shoaib Shaheen said that he is working all the time.
Judge Shahrukh Arjamand directed PTI lawyer Usman Gill to complete the arguments. On which lawyer Niazullah Niazi said that arguments have been completed, Rizwan Abbasi had to give arguments. Judge Shahrukh Arjamand said that Usman Gill has only to answer, the arguments are complete.
Lawyer Usman Gill, while replying, said that the complaint in the marriage case was filed late in Idt, before that a private complaint was filed, but the lawyer was still Rizwan Abbasi.
Lawyer Usman Riaz Gul said that the complaint was filed with delay in the Iddat Nikah case. Later, a re-complaint was filed by Manika through the same lawyer who had filed the first complaint.
Lawyer Usman Gill told the court that the former prosecutor Ranahsan Abbas had placed the facts regarding the case before the court and it was transferred the next day. On which Judge Shahrukh Arjamand said what can you expect after that?
The PTI lawyer said that a criminal hearing can be held only if the family court declares any marriage illegal, no marriage can be declared illegal without the family court’s declaration.
Lawyer Usman Gul said that after completing the period of Iddat at her husband’s house, Bushra Bibi stayed at her mother’s house for five to six months after which the marriage took place. Not under criminal law.
Prosecutor Adnan while giving arguments told the court that divorce is not effective before the period of Iddat is completed, during Iddat Nikah, we did not plead regarding termination of the marriage of founder PTI and Bushra Bibi.
The prosecutor pleaded for upholding the trial court’s conviction in the Iddat marriage case of founder PTI and Bushra Bibi, saying that in 1989, Khawarmanika and Bushra Bibi got married.
They were happily married, twenty-eight years of marriage, five children were born, but Bushra Bibi was divorced due to the intervention of PTI founder, Imran Khan repeatedly interfered in Khawarmanika, Bushra Bibi’s life.
Prosecutor Adnan Ali said that Khawarmanika said that the house was destroyed due to the intervention of founder PTI. Recorded statement of 342 without oath.
After listening to the arguments of the parties, Sessions Judge Shahrukh Arjamand reserved the decision on the appeals against the sentence of Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi in the Iddat Nikah case.
